I wish to restate my life history here. I won't waste the courts' time. My name is Mohini Hersom     [28.08.1958], and this concerns the probate case involving my sister, Viju Wortley.     [19.06.1962]. I am going to add large font numbered tags in red (a, b, c) for additional sections, and Arabic numerals in red (1, 2, 3...) for documents submitted here in support of my case.

My opponent, my sister, had a civil and a criminal case against me, as well as an injunction injunction     [0001]that started in 2013, along with the criminal conviction for "harassment without violence", sentence / community order     [0002]

This injunction does not permit me to contact Viju or members of her family in any manner, or to ask anyone to contact them. This applies to her husband, her son, and her daughter. This does not apply to our parents, who lived in a different locality, and they were not part of the injunction or incrimination process.

At the start of 2024. my boyfriend, Alex McDowell of London, asked my father to ask my sister to drop the injunction. My father came back with the message that she said she would never drop it for life. That's because Alex claimed that the Home Office was refusing a visa to enter the UK to see my father before he died, father's death certificate     [0003], because of the injunction.

I'm going to say something about the British Home Office as well, because this is relevant to my story, which is a more colossal story than a simple case of (false) incrimination by my sister. But for the moment, what you have learned is that I applied for a visitor visa to visit my father before he died GWF065529877 2022-09-14 visa refusal     [0004], GWF069062307 2023-02-11 visa refusal     [0005], and GWF076943005 2024-06-10 visa refusal     [0006], which were all refused.

Because the Home Office is part of the bad opinion about me based on sisters false allegations made without evidence, Public good, notice#IS151C     [0007] my sister's case pales into insignificance, although her comments made on official documents may be extremely offensive. I'm going to say it as it is, stating only physical facts, for the judge to decide.

Now, going back to the injunction, it stops me from contacting my father when he is in her house, by visiting her house, and ringing the front doorbell, because once he moved in with my sister permanently, he became unresponsive on WhatsApp. So much so, I wouldn't know if he was alive or dead, and I was confident my sister would never want me to know.

I'm going to go over my story about how my sister prevented a relationship with my father, Columns 1-28     [0008] and I have got details, but wish to bring out certain truths, and I hope it will be verified. I hope that my statements will be understood/verified and found to be truthful.

I read in the newspapers while I was in the UK about some convicted murderers getting family visits in jail. Their family members who visited were not the aggrieved party. Also in 2013, in the latter part of the year, some foreign murderers, who had almost finished serving their criminal sentence, had their deportation stayed so as to to remain in the UK to be with their children.

Of course, this caused a public uproar, and this news item disappeared from Google searches, but these cases can probably be found in legal case databases like LexisNexis.

In this respect, the Home Office has clearly treated me worse than a murderer.

I was represented by Mr Abu Sufian in 2024, 2025, 2026, (ccl=client care letter) in the immigration case to obtain a visitor’s visa CCL immigration matter visitor visa application     [0009] ,     CCL immigration matter JR application     [0010] , as well as in the criminal case CCL reopening criminal case     [0011] as well as in the probate case CCL probate matter     [0012], from which he has recently resigned 2024- 06-04 Mr Abu Sufian formal statement of withdrawal     [0013]         He had advised all parties he is no longer acting for me     [0014] The Home Office wrote to Mr Sufian (0012)(2024), of which I have a copy, where it says I cannot be allowed to enter the UK to meet my father before he dies, because to enter the UK to see him, I would have to be his wife, or his child under 18 years of age.See bottom para of page 4 of 6     [0015]

This doesn't make much sense, but I feel Mr Sufian did not make an aggressive application or try to discuss issues the judge might look at. He just wrote "I want this"- why would they give you something just because you want it?. In the criminal conviction, Mr Sufian took (I think) more than £20,000, of which I paid £5,000, and Alex paid the rest. He just sat on the case after collecting all the installments. He said he was waiting for papers from the court to reopen the case. They cannot give papers until their investigation is finished, he said.

So far so good, but the barrister refused to explain to us what papers he was waiting for, and whether I might have a copy. That will remain a mystery forever. But Alex, my ex-boyfriend, argued that the courts take forever, and he's going to deliver the goods. I was somewhat skeptical because I felt he wasn't acting properly and didn't want to further my legal rights.

Maybe if he made an aggressive application, there would be points the judge would look at. While my father died in August 2024, Mr Sufian took my probate case in December 2024. He asked me to keep getting a caveat to stop the grant of probateCaveat to stop grant of probate, September 2024     [0016]    Caveat to stop grant of probate, March 2025    [0017]        Caveat to stop grant of probate, September 2025    [0018]        In fact, he wasn't even bothered to act or advise in any way. I told him about the caveat, so he just said, " That's good, get another one". If I hadn't told him, I think he would not have even cared. He started acting on my probate case in January 2026. And I was restless about the way it was going, making a mystery out of everything, but Alex feels that they have a delay for good reason, and he seems to trust the legal experts no matter what they do.

So I didn't do well for representation despite paying money.

Alex is a truly wonderful man, and our unhappiness together with the legal conflicts has resulted in a split, different from our physical separation. He has traveled extensively with me and saved my life at a strange hospital. He is still my very good friend, and I'm happy to see him if he wants me. I want God to give him a good wife and a great life.

But life was very difficult, and right now I am no longer Alex McDowell’s partner, and he is no longer my nearest of kin. It's been very traumatic and sad.

My version of the story differs from the version given by my sister Viju Wortley in official documents. Her version is respected, and mine is not. Both are unproven. When two parties lie in a court, or the judge cannot make out who is telling the truth, he or she makes a decision, which is then taken as "the truth."

I therefore hope I get a hearing, especially as I aim to stay relevant and not waste the time of the courts.

On 8th July 2013, I was convicted at Basingstoke Magistrates ' Court of "harassment without violence". (0002)The plaintiff is Viju Wortley, my sister,against whom I am attempting to contest a probate case.

I have been advised that a decision made in court would be pointless to deny, unless it has been overturned by the court (I am referring to the criminal court). In my own imagination, I understand that guilty people would generally claim that they are innocent, and the pressure to be innocent may be very great if one has tried to harm one's family members. That's why my allegation that the harassment was fabricated would fall on deaf ears. That is not what I did. It was something else that I did,](17) which has a completely different flavour. I also realize that the human tongue can lie a lot when it comes to money matters and profit.

So I will say politely, all kinds of allegations have been submitted by the plaintiff in her civil (16)and criminal cases, a raw, undisputable fact.

The crucial part of the allegations was that I harassed Viju and her children, because I wanted to bear children. She said I would also kidnap her babies. She put this in the civil case, Civil case, Reading County Court 2013-05-23     [0019]    which ran parallel to the criminal case(0014), where she allegedly told the prosecutor I wouldn't harm a fly. I am not sure how she got to talk with the prosecutor. Is it normal in the UK for a "terrified woman" to be able to speak to the prosecutor about her private feelings from minute to minute?

And I also don't know how the story in her civil case that I would kidnap her babies was sustained in the court. Did the court understand that her babies were six feet tall, and I was an old lady with a small frame? She had paid a lot of money to attempt to get an injunction from me to prevent me from entering five counties for a year or get imprisoned for a year, some such thing. That was because her children traveled in some bus into those counties once a year, and if I were on that bus, I might kidnap them

It's all in the documents, and there is no ambiguity about this fact. She submitted some group emails     [0019] I had sent in heat and anger, as evidence in her civil and criminal cases, but neither were these emails sent to her, nor did they have a trace of referenceto Viju and her family, nor did they have any ideations referring to children, bearing children, or kidnapping children.

I did do some things, not run after women and children as alleged, but they were covered up by the plaintiff, because she allegedly wanted privacy. The plaintiff accused me of something I didn't do, so that she could get a lasting conviction to nail me for life. I fully understand that this old civil and criminal case, no matter who told the truth and no matter who lied or did not lie, is not directly relevant to the probate. But if she is trying to get me out of the way, they are relevant.

Some points to be noted.

My sister hired a limousine chauffeur, a white uniformed man in a car that was a mile long, to hand-deliver the civil case papers to me, staying at Alex's home. The limousine guy said I would pay and pay money, pay for everything for what I've done. He was told, he alleged, to stand outside the door and wait to catch me, because he was not supposed to ring the bell. I think that is because there was another person living in the house, and he wanted to meet me alone. Then he delivered his civil case papers on 15.05.2013, [0019]a 27-page document.

I had the hearing on 23 5 2013. Vijus lawyer said the same thing as the limousine driver, that I would pay and pay. Viju had bought privacy, and I had difficulty finding the correct court in the court building. The lawyer told the judge - I assume that was his client's instructions - that I had a very special kind of mental illness, that would change from minute to minute, so that one evaluation might find me normal, the next evaluation might find me mentally incompetent. I don't know if "mental incompetence" being an easily-used item like a cup of coffee is a people's passion or a faith in the UK, but it wasn't questioned by the judge.

There wasn't any requirement in any of the courts to produce a medical report corroborating my sister's allegations. I do want to admit at this point that they're coincident with my father's allegations, which are very abusive and hurtful. The civil judge did say that she had never seen a case like that before, where anybody was banned from five counties.     [0019]

Her lawyer had a sense of fairness and told me she had paid £6,000 for a single attendance at the court. He also told me she was hiding on the fifth floor and had instructed him to come up to the fifth floor after the hearing and drive her home.

In her civil case, my sister requested an injunction banning me from entering 5 counties in the UK. She wanted me banned for a year, and if I didn't comply, I should be jailed for a year, some such thing on the civil document (it's all in the documents). She alleged that her children travel in public transport once a year in those counties, and if I am on one of the buses, I might kidnap them.

I don't know whether this is some kind of covert murder case. I have heard of murder cases where a woman won't have children, and then she cuts the baby out of a heavily pregnant woman and takes it, and of course their mother and baby won't survive. Well, if it's that kind of case, I wanted to know that my sister's children had reached six feet in height in 2013, and that type of crazy woman (and I'm not that -it's fabrication) wouldn't go after six-foot-tall children, I don't think they would, at least. I'm a puny old lady, and I wouldn't be able to overpower them. It would be the other way around.

The civil judge said that if the plaintiff failed to achieve a criminal conviction of me, she would immediately drop the civil case. But as soon as a criminal conviction was achieved, my sister. (who probably received competent legal counsel) withdrew her civil case.

The point is, there is a question about the Home Office because this is no ordinary case. I allege that my late mother, Mrs Radha     [15.05.1934 – 26.02.2022], told me {in 2014 or 2015} that Viju told her she spent much more than £20000 pounds on this case. And that she told Radha, "I will frame a murder case against Mohini". I also allege Alex McDowell asked my father at the start of 2024 to ask Viju if she would consider dropping the injunction, which he said was the legal barrier to prevent me from getting a visa to enter the UK. My father came back with the message to me that Viju said she would keep the injunction for life.

In 2024, it had been 11 years, and now it is 13 years of me respecting the injunction. Of course, she can tell lies that I have not obeyed the injunction. It is difficult to disprove the negative, and as she is not required to physically provide evidence of her allegations, her word is taken as truth automatically.

The other thing is that there is a higher involvement, like the HOME OFFICE, and that's something that needs to be made clear. You can say it's not directly relevant to the probate case. I don't know if there can be any case that the home of his home is doing something strange. They probably don't have a point in the law, which makes it relevant what the Home Office did.

    [2024], I also have several attempts to contact my father (**) and registered post letters (**) that returned to sender, a Tamil friend's note under the door (**) asking to see father, ignored, and my father's signature twice was forged by (**) someone living in ot near his house after he was no longer there to make me think he was living there, etc

I've got email conversation tapes - I don't know if that's liked by the court, but that would be the only way of restoring my dignity, if not getting any money out of this.

So she had lots of ways of contacting me and letting me have the will. My father's two neighbors in 18 Carston (**) and 20 Carston Grove, (**) the Basingstoke police,(**) and my father's counsel, whoever they were, everyone had my address, and she knew my boyfriend's address and telephone number. She is an educated woman and an accountant and it is very easy for her to understand that she could have easily given me the will from 1 August 2024 to 9 March 2026.

She refused the attempts by Mr Sufian to get the will, and on the second attempt, when he said he was going to sue her, she produced the will.(**) (**) (**)

So she was not a competent executor because it's the executor's duty to produce the will. She could not have thought I'm not interested, possibly because I am mentally incompetent. That's because I am sure she applied for the grant of probate, and I had requested a caveat to stop the grant of probate, and she obviously knew I was alive and interested. It was her job to tell the police at least that she wanted to give me the will.

During the criminal conviction (by the way), she produced letters which I had written, and she had scanned them and taken off the signature and date, and she told the police woman that I wrote them anonymously because I was born mentally incompetent.

You see, my father and my sister have been saying that about me, and my father's history of saying that pre-dates the UK in 2004. It doesn't help my probate case if I admit that my father said I was born mentally incompetent, but I think I need to give the true picture so the judge can make a decision.

I do believe my father was a mixture of positive and negative, and he did say he was definitely going to include me in the will, even if my sister didn't like me because I asked him that very specific question. I didn't ask him what he was giving, but he said, "Take it out of your mind that I will disinherit you. He had sent a message through Alex earlier that he was unable to give me the inheritance if he did not have my address.

I had trouble in the past with my immigration applications because my father was calling them from another country and ruining my immigration applications. This information does not pertain to the UK.

What you know in the UK is that I lived there from 2004 to 2018, that I was on deportation proceedings which were connected to my sister's criminal conviction of me, that I left the UK to escape the deportation which I felt was bound to happen, that I had to separate from my partner, and my life is not very good here. But I don't think I need to come back to the UK. I would like to have a visitor's visa, but this desire is paled in significance in the face of the indignities piled on me.

During the criminal conviction ( and I'm going back to 2013), I found out that Viju had a longstanding relationship with a home office official, a lady of Lunar House. I'm going to give those details in a separate statement.

Her protection officer threw a note at me and discussed my deportation with Lunar House. I had talked from a wall phone with a Lunar House employee, the previous day and it was obvious this was a s long standing dialogue. I think Home Office officials make and obey the law, and this lady, who was elderly at the time, has possibly retired. I'm sure if somebody looked for a shit they would find her. She came to the place where as detained overnight and at Basingstoke police station. Her protection officer police woman wanted me grabbed and put in an aeroplane to India when I was not even charged. She apologized profusely for arriving on the scene. She said she knew nothing of my case, and came because she had been called nothing else.

This is an obstruction of due process. (I am not sure of the proper legal term for this.).

You see, my parents had done some human rights abuses before I came to the UK in 2004.

So, as parents, they have a mixture of good and bad. They had always wanted to come to the UK, despite my fear of inviting instant hatred, and I'm going to make a bold statement because it's only an allegation.

I got a physics degree in the UK, living here from 1981 to 1983 because my father came here with his whole family. But after that, Viju just stayed on, and I went to the US. As I said, those are in the past, and they're not relevant to the probate case.

My mother had earlier said that Viju was mean and she wouldn't sponsor them (my parents' visa application to the UK), and she didn't want them sleeping overnight in her house. I think Viju not wanting my parents using their spare bedroom wasn't very kind.

But because my parents had done some human rights abuses, and I came to the UK on a spouse visa by coincidence, not by plan, in December 2004. I had never had an ambition to come to the UK; it was my destiny. My parents wasted no time and came to the UK days after my arrival. And they bought a house. Having come to the UK in 2005, they bought a house in 2006, which is the house cited on the probate case. My parents did not let me know they were living in the UK and pretended to live in India until 2010, which is when I found out the truth. Alex said we should Google their mobile numbers, which led us to finding their address.

I know how the Home Office thinks they are good people and consider it ethical to deny a visitor visa to see my father before he dies.

But from their point of view, my parents had applied for the visa and were anxious to get it, like everybody else who applies for a visa. They had a bad history with me. They wanted to make sure I didn’t say anything bad about them, which rumours would spread to the home office. Naturally, it would be in my parents’ selfish interest to malign my name, so anything I potentially said would be trashed by the Home Office. Of course, if they maligned my name, that could affect my immigration application, which was a different kind, and could affect other areas of my life. My parents were selfish, putting their needs and egos before mine. They knew my sister, who had thus far spurned their ambition to become UK residents, would be a willing ally, delighted to join forces with anyone who said bad things about me.

They did not ask me if I could write a letter of sponsorship because I am a resident in the UK, and as you know, I had just arrived with my husband on a spouse visa. In the normal case, when nothing unusual has happened, the normal applies - the home office would wonder why this old couple,both of whose daughters were now living in the UK, had a letter of sponsorship/ kinship/ recommendation/ welcome from only one daughter.

Such an anomalous situation would happen if the other daughter refused to provide such support, or if she were not informed that the parents were attempting to settle in the UK.

My parents chose not to inform me of the reason why they turned up almost at the front door of where I was staying remotely with my in-laws and husband. People of all races and cultures like a bit of time on their own and not to deal with stress from parents and multi-racial conflicts when they are newlyweds. My father denounced my husband's religion, by the way.

Instead, they decided not to involve me but to use my name without my knowledge. I suspect they use my name without my knowledge and wrote up some histories saying that I am mentally incompetent.

I'm very offended by the term, but I understand that UK people are usually not offended by the term. But if you are personally "accused" of it, would you be offended? That probably depends on your overall educational and positional status.

I philosophize the matter and wonder whether I should keep on living if everybody in the world disrespects me, or if all men in the world disrespect me, while women surge forth in thousands with overflowing buckets of "kindness".

Anyhow, the mentally incompetent thing is an issue with me and I need it to be rigorously verified, but since the UK courts allow such a term to be freely used in court by combative plaintiffs or defendants, without a report from a licensed physician. I would want my case to at least  be heard.

My case of how my sister sabotaged my right to contact my father, and secondarily, that my father himself made malicious referrals to the mental health services ETC in 2010

I believe my parents got their indefinite leave to remain in 2011.  If I am right, then he was just waiting for his visa, and it was in his best interest to keep me down so that he could be glorious and get his visa.

My father used his senior position in pharmaceuticals in the Indian government and his overall social and financial status to malign my name.

Because there are a lot of immigrant women in the UK, yes, they will swoon when a man has money or power and says he's very great. I had difficulty convincing some women that my father is not a doctor. They would say he is very big; he is a doctor. Big he may be, but doctor he is not.

This family, consisting of a couple with two adult young daughters, came to the UK in 1981 because my father, who worked for the erstwhile Imperial Chemical Industries. He was transferred here on a two-year program. He was actually sacked from Imperial Chemical Industries in 1983 (quote Sir Ronnie Hampel), and he went back to India and got the Chairman's job in Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals.

A lawyer representing me in an immigration case said that I was not to say that because it is delusional. These are all facts. No matter how badly the Home Office thinks of me, I am sure they will understand that facts are facts and if they want to verify them their correct, except that they are old facts.

None of these things makes me respect or disrespect my father. He was just "father". My mother was just "mother" too. The UK people seemed to think that my parents were from a sublime, superior class, and that I was from a low, wretched class, which is augmented by my sister's testimonies in the civil and criminal case, and whatever documents are being produced for probate by her. I suppose my sister is also classified in the same sublime superior classes as my parents.

Well, when we came here, my father kept me in Cheadle Royal Hospital for one year for counseling from June 1981 to June 1982. I was not locked up or sectioned, but to me, that is a pure technicality. I do not look down on people who are locked up or sectioned because I feel these statuses are a virtual reality and how the law works. There are many healthy people in the community who should be locked up in prisons and asylums; therefore, I don't use that juicy event to judge any person positively or negatively. I think that would be outstanding evidence from my sister's point of view that I was born crazy. I don't think so, I think it tells you something about this family.

Yes, I don't want to make any bones about it.  It is my belief that my father would have quoted these facts and used them as evidence that I am a lifelong mental incompetent. If he had said so at the time of making his immigration to the UK in 2006, he might have wanted that maintained for a five-year period until his visa was granted. Of course, the Home Office may say they don't mind if he calls me mentally incompetent, but he is my father, and he comes from the same country and background as me. It would worry him that it might be perceived as malicious. I feel that he needed me to be incompetent during that entire period.

All officials in India, or almost everybody, are known to be corrupt, and that is a fact about on third world countries.

I hope I can be understood because all this is difficult for me to put into writing. Given time, I can, but I've got a whole bunch of proof of contacting my father in 2024.

2024     Jump to the top of this page

I was speaking to my father daily on WhatsApp then his 90th birthday occurred, 18th January 2024. The birthday card I sent from Dublin did not arrive on time and I sent a second one. The second one also did not make it for the 18th of January.I expressed regrets but my father said " it doesn't matter if I never see your birthday card because I was told of your good intentions" The next morning my father called himself an ambulance and checked into Royal Berkshire Hospital. I was extremely concerned that he wasn't answering his WhatsApp and I called around to find that he was in the hospital. 3 days later he was discharged go back to his home and my sister Viju had to drive him back. I think my father never saw the birthday card. Perhaps when she took him back to his house, she saw the card on the floor, and he might have been in a wheelchair etc, over my sister used the key to open the door. She could have easily found my birthday card do my father and destroyed it I was speaking to him every day from the 22nd and on the 23rd or 24th my father became unresponsive to WhatsApp. I was worried every single day that he might have died but I couldn't predict when actually he would die. I was crying as I thought he would die and nobody would let me know and wasn't allowed to say goodbye

Once more I was worried sick, and contacted Basingstoke police. They did not remember me from 2013, but I told them I had an injunction and I needed their help to monitor my father's health and was worried about him. That explains Row #1 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html.  

Police said they cannot do live and well checks unless I swear that my sister is an incompetent or cruel carer. They however check the ambulance records and told me that no ambulance has visited that address. So if my father had been staying there he was still alive.

Couple of days later my father responded that he was holidaying in Cornwall. This is an SMS and is in Row #2 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html

In those texts my father expressed a dislike of my boyfriend Alex McDowell but said once he was back home we could chat on WhatsApp.

But once my father returned home, he was speaking sentences that I believe were brainwashed by my brother-in-law Steven Wortley. "The Atomic Eeapons Establishment in their wisdom want you to stay out of the UK."- That was one thing he said. The other thing he said was that Viju confided in him how she needed to make up the "danger to children thing" because, when I sent newsletters to his email an the Atomin Weapons Establishment, he was temporarily suspended for a few days. She told my father that she had to make sure that sort of thing never happens to Steve again.

In some ways I'm not very bright and I didn't think about the fathers inheritance. I was crying that he would soon die. I was afraid to tell my father, "! feel worried when you become unresponsive on WhatsApp ,because you may have died". My father asked, "why do you worry" and I didn't want to tell him why.

I am some ways an idiot and I also respected my father's wishes mostly to not be photograph or tape him In the third week of March my father became permanently unresponsive to WhatsApp. The church, Row#22 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html, went to my father's house 19 Carston Grove in the 4rth week of March 2024 to check where he was. 

The next door neighbor Mrs Tidbury of 20th Carston Grove told the pastor that my father was staying with my sister.

I tried a number of ways of contacting my father like calling his GPs practice. Row#9 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html When my father was walking and talking the GP secretaries maintained civil courtesy.   But once my father moved into my sisters home permanently, which took place around the third week of March, the Secretary told me it is illegal form us to tell you whether your father is alive or dead

That can't be the law

So I tried to pursue contacting the GP but I full I am fully aware that doctors do not take phone calls particularly from members of the public or not their patients. Anyway I tried to pursue the doctor lined the utmost in Rows9,14,21

I also tried NHS complaints about the Secretary and said I want to know about my father. That they told me it is illegal to tell you if your father is alive or dead. this complaint is in The energies complaint ladies started getting b***** with me Row14    Row21 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html

I put an ad in the local Bargain Finder called ad post looking for my father. A Tamil Speaking man responded from Reading said we speak that language. He said if my father would speak to him in our native language he would visit to do a live-and-well check. His name was John and I paid his taxi driver's fare and he went there. John connected the WhatsApp to me so that I could hear a large dog barking inside my sisters home. He was afraid the large animal would maul him but Viju and Steve at not home on a weekday afternoon on 24th April. It was not possible to tell if my father was inside alone, as he may have been unable to answer the doorbell

John put a note under the door that he wanted to speak to my father and there was worried and wanted to do a live and well check. Row#17 of of prevented-from-seeing-father.html

I also wrote a registered post letter to my father in very large font. I posted the identical letter to 19 Carston Grove and Mala on 19th april 2024. I sent the same letter by registered post to only 19 Carston Grove in May 2024. Row #16 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html

Both letters of April were addressed just to my father and it said private and confidential meaning that nobody else was supposed to be the recipient. The injunction only covered my sister and her husband and two children. My father was in their home and I wanted to get through to my father hence John left the note and of course she ignored it.

I anticipated that my sister would most probably throw away letters I wrote to dad and not let him see them

In order to trace what happened to my post, I use the company called Mailboxes in Dorset. They are very nice people and they h ave been praised in the newspapers because they offer services to homeless people and you don't have to be a monthly fee. I paid £10 to post a couple of letters and to track what happened to my letters to the UK(From Ireland)

When I sent two identical letters on 19th April to Carston Grove and Mala. Mailboxes Inc scanned me the Returned to sender envelope. The April letter to 10 Carston Grove was signed and accepted by somebody called KRISH. I want to let you know that Asian men like to spell their names in multiple ways but my father has never signed as KRISH and the signature was not remotely like my fathers handwriting.

The recipient who signed as, and impersonated my father, was either living at 19 Carston Grove or it was the Tidbury family at 20 Carston Grove who had instructions from my sister or father himself to collect mail sent to him.

It is unlikely someone was living at 19 Carston Grove in April /May 2024. Although my sister may have realized my father who was alive would never go back there, yet I feel there was not time for her to empty the house contents and get a tenant. I feel one of the Tidburys must have signed as KRISH

What might have happened is Mrs Tidbury of house number 20 may have picked up the letter and have asked royal men to deliver it to her instead of 19 because nobody was living there and she might have signed us KRISH

The registered letter I sent in May 2024 to 19 Carston Grove was also signed for by a second individual whose handwriting was different from whoever signed in April 2024, and also not remotely like my father's handwriting. This person signed as VENKATARAMANAN.

The motive of these 2 people is simple. They IMPERSONATED MY FATHER because they wanted me to think he was living there. These 2 individuals may not have known me. They were perhaps pretending to anyone who would come to 19 Carston Grove that my father was in there.

Why?

Viju would have wanted that. She would not want me to know where my father was at any point in time, as she was PARANOID that I might locate or speak to father. I knew my father did not live at 19 Carston Grove because the church had found out that he was at my sister's.

Row#18 of prevented-from-seeing-father.html. I kept calling and leaving messages on his landline mobile and whatsapp, crying I cant get through to you.

There's a level of hatred from the community in 2024, of we had 7 whole months (Jan1 August 1) of my father being alive.

This hatred was reflected by the lying of Hampshire County Council, who would not tell me my father's latest condition.

And my father's GP Dr. Mrs Rock rather the office secretaries at Theale Medical Practice said, "it is illegal to tell you whether your father is alive or dead".

I don't believe there is a law in the UK that it's illegal to tell me whether my father is alive or dead.

I also put an ad with my mobile number in Adpost, the reading branch, to ask anyone to help me find my father because I wanted to know if you were alive or dead.

I felt my father would be in Viju home or in one of the two hospitals. Somebody must have taken my mobile number from Adpost and I was getting hundreds of calls from mobiles of the UK saying things like "Madame do you have the time" and "what is your address /name"-and stuff like that at 2am in the morning, I begged and pumped for information and one of them told me that my number was on a heavyweight boxers escort magazine.

Clearly they were playing a prank and it indicates the presence of a large number of men in the UK who absolutely hate my guts. I was dealt with evasiveness and sullen anger by the Hampshire County Council. I was told later by a lawyer that unless there's a financial loss you can't sue them for and if the UK administration won't take a complaint you can't do anything .

But I have loads of logs Row#20including my complaint to the Hampshire County Council CEO posted on July 20, which became official in July 25th Row#24. The news of my father's death on 1 August 2024 was sent by Hants Council on 9th August, after my sister had an unattended cremation in the early hours of 8 August. Maybe the Hants council also hated me and did not want contact with or knowledge of my father until he was not only dead but also cremated and done away with. They said in their email that because of my complaint, they had to inform me.

Row#26Viju did not go to see the body, and the whole thing was done unmanned from the time he died at 1915 hours at Basingstoke hospital, by the funeral directors Alexander and Dr Y, and Mrs Wortley came and picked up the Ashes. Basingstoke Crematorium said this was the cheapest funeral allowed in the UK.

My sister wanted it private and hush-hush in case I attended fathers funeral.